Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064351›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Patients' health literacy and health behaviour assessment in primary health care: evidence from a cross-sectional survey.

Kristina Šulinskaitė, Daiva Zagurskienė, Aurelija Blaževičienė

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Health literacy of the Deaf community: a scoping review.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina ŠulinskaitėDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania. sulinskaite.kristina@gmail.com.
Daiva ZagurskienėDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Aurelija BlaževičienėDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is defined as a person's ability to find, understand, and use health-related information when making health-related decisions. Patients with lower health literacy more frequently face difficulties when they have health issues or need medical help. Such patients are less likely to visit health care facilities and receive less help, which subsequently leads to higher hospitalization and mortality rates. Patients with better health literacy skills pay more attention to their health behaviours.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional survey conducted in two primary health care centres-one public and one private-in Lithuania. The study enrolled patients who were visiting family physicians (n = 399). The study used the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47). Calculation of means and two independent samples were used for statistical analysis, and a correlation coefficient was calculated.

resultsThe majority (40.6%) of respondents had problematic health literacy, while only 7% had excellent health literacy. Better health literacy was observed among younger patients (aged below 30 years), residing in urban areas, having higher education, and living with a partner. Inadequate or problematic health literacy was noted among 83.6% of respondents aged 59 years and older; similar rates were also observed among patients with basic or primary education (76.1%), secondary education (76.6%), and divorced patients (86%). Respondents with better health literacy also had better health behaviours (p < 0.05).

conclusionsHealth literacy is influenced by age, residence, education, and family status. Patients with better health literacy also reported better health behaviours.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyCross-Sectional StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth behaviourHealth careHealth literacyPatientsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID36064351
PMCPMC9446736
OpenAlexW4294689765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.