ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022
Ensemble of Deep Neural Networks based on Condorcet's Jury Theorem for screening Covid-19 and Pneumonia from radiograph images.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-ray Images: A Comprehensive Survey.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- A methodical exploration of imaging modalities from dataset to detection through machine learning paradigms in prominent lung disease diagnosis: a review.BMC medical imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 detection using Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis has been the subject of several studies. Deep Neural Networks with hundreds or even millions of parameters (weights) are referred to as "black boxes" because their behavior is difficult to comprehend, even when the model's structure and weights are visible. On the same dataset, different Deep Convolutional Neural Networks perform differently. So, we do not necessarily have to rely on just one model; instead, we can evaluate our final score by combining multiple models. While including multiple models in the voter pool, it is not always true that the accuracy will improve. So, In this regard, the authors proposed a novel approach to determine the voting ensemble score of individual classifiers based on Condorcet's Jury Theorem (CJT). The authors demonstrated that the theorem holds while ensembling the N number of classifiers in Neural Networks. With the help of CJT, the authors proved that a model's presence in the voter pool would improve the likelihood that the majority vote will be accurate if it is more accurate than the other models. Besides this, the authors also proposed a Domain Extended Transfer Learning (DETL) ensemble model as a soft voting ensemble method and compared it with CJT based ensemble method. Furthermore, as deep learning models typically fail in real-world testing, a novel dataset has been used with no duplicate images. Duplicates in the dataset are quite problematic since they might affect the training process. Therefore, having a dataset devoid of duplicate images is considered to prevent data leakage problems that might impede the thorough assessment of the trained models. The authors also employed an algorithm for faster training to save computational efforts. Our proposed method and experimental results outperformed the state-of-the-art with the DETL-based ensemble model showing an accuracy of 97.26%, COVID-19, sensitivity of 98.37%, and specificity of 100%. CJT-based ensemble model showed an accuracy of 98.22%, COVID-19, sensitivity of 98.37%, and specificity of 99.79%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.