Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36063312›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2023

Differences in Art Appreciation in Autism: A Measure of Reduced Intuitive Processing.

Mark Brosnan, Chris Ashwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Paranoia and Data-Gathering Biases in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Autistic adults' inclination to lie in everyday situations.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark BrosnanDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Applied Autism Research, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. pssmjb@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-1492
Chris AshwinDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Applied Autism Research, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Art appreciation reflects an initial emotional and intuitive response to artwork evaluation, although this intuitive evaluation can be attenuated by subsequent deliberation. The Dual Process Theory of Autism proposes that individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have a greater propensity to deliberate and reduced intuition compared to matched controls. Evaluations of high- and low-quality artworks were undertaken by 107 individuals with a diagnosis of ASD and 145 controls. Controls consistently evaluated high-quality artworks to be much better quality than the low-quality artworks, reflecting intuitive processing. The ASD sample showed a reduced difference in evaluations between high- versus low-quality artwork, which reflects reduced intuitive processing and greater deliberative processing and is consistent with predictions by the Dual Process Theory of Autism.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderEmotionsHumansIntuitionArt appreciationAutismDeliberationDual process theoryIntuition

Identifiers

PMID36063312
PMCPMC10539443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.