Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36063278›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with BRCAness Phenotype: A Treatment Challenge.

Cláudia Caeiro, Inês Leão, Inês Oliveira, Isabel Sousa, Teresa André

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cláudia CaeiroCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Inês LeãoCentro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Inês OliveiraInstituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. ines.calvinho.oliveira@gmail.com.
Isabel SousaCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Teresa AndréHospital Dr. Nélio Mendonça, Funchal, Portugal.
Hospital de São João · PTCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PTHospital Central do Funchal · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOvarian cancer is a leading cause of death among women with gynecologic malignancies. The relapse rate is high after platinum-based therapy, with the effectiveness of subsequent treatment lines decreasing over time. Recent data suggest the benefit of maintenance therapy with niraparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent disease. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We report a case series of five women with advanced ovarian cancer and BRCAness phenotype who responded favorably, and in some cases with long-term response, to maintenance therapy with niraparib. Toxicities were as expected and generally manageable. Two patients developed grade 2/3 hematological toxicity, which resolved with treatment suspension and subsequent dose reductions, and one patient reported a rare skin toxicity while responding to full-dose niraparib treatment, which was controlled with photoprotection and sunscreen. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis case series highlights the role of PARP1/2 inhibitors as a new standard of care as maintenance therapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian cancer, irrespective of BRCA status.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhenotypeSunscreening AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsSunscreening AgentsAdvanced ovarian cancerBRCAnessMaintenance therapyPARP1/2 inhibitorPlatinum-sensitive

Identifiers

PMID36063278
PMCPMC9442551
OpenAlexW4294613189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.