ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2022
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: does variant histology matter?
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis from the Korean Bladder Cancer Research Group.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Article
- Neoadjuvant treatment patterns and biomarker selection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Variant histology muscle invasive bladder cancer should not preclude neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Trop-2 and Ephrin B2 expression in urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation and aggressive urothelial carcinoma subtypes.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- PD-L1 and nectin-4 expression and genomic characterization of bladder cancer with divergent differentiation.Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe most frequent histology of bladder tumors is urothelial carcinoma. Most are pure urothelial carcinomas (PUC) but up to one-third of the cases present variant histological (VH) features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of variant histology in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in patients with urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 77 patients with bladder cancer who performed neoadjuvant chemotherapy at two institutions.
resultsComplete pathological response (ypT0) was higher in patients with PUC (38.5%), comparing with VH (12%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that variant histology is associated with an 89% lesser likelihood of tumor downstaging, with advanced clinical T stages and positive smoking history as independent predictors. The estimated mean cancer-specific survival was 68.91 months for PUC patients and 50.23 months for VH patients (log rank test, P = 0.024). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that VH and clinical T stage were independent predictors of cancer-specific survival, indicating a worse outcome for patients with VH and advanced clinical T stages.
conclusionsThere are only a few retrospective studies evaluating the clinical impact of variant histology tumors, which are mainly managed as PUC. Our results demonstrate that VH is associated with a worse likelihood of tumor downstaging after NAC and a worse cancer-specific survival in bladder cancer patients. There is a need for further studies and genetic analysis to identify the patients most likely to achieve ypT0 status and downstaging after NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.