Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36063163›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2022

Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC).

Peter Horak, Malachi Griffith, Arpad M Danos, Beth A Pitel, Subha Madhavan, Xuelu Liu, Cynthia Chow, Heather Williams, Leigh Carmody, Lisa Barrow-Laing and 37 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating ctDNA testing forAdvances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Somatic and germline aberrations in homologous recombination repair genes among Chinese high-risk breast cancer patients by multi-gene next-generation sequencing.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Peter Horak
Malachi Griffith
Arpad M Danos
Beth A Pitel
Subha Madhavan
Xuelu Liu
Cynthia Chow
Heather Williams
Leigh Carmody
Lisa Barrow-Laing
Damian Rieke
Simon Kreutzfeldt
Albrecht Stenzinger
David Tamborero
Manuela Benary
Padma Sheila Rajagopal
Cristiane M Ida
Harry Lesmana
Laveniya Satgunaseelan
Jason D Merker
Michael Y Tolstorukov
Paulo Vidal Campregher
Jeremy L Warner
Shruti Rao
Maya Natesan
Haolin Shen
Jeffrey Venstrom
Somak Roy
Kayoko Tao
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
Xinjie Xu
Deborah I Ritter
Kym Pagel
Kilannin Krysiak
Adrian Dubuc
Yassmine M Akkari
Xuan Shirley Li
Jennifer Lee
Ian King
Gordana Raca
Alex H Wagner
Marylin M Li
Sharon E Plon
Shashikant Kulkarni
Obi L Griffith
Debyani Chakravarty
Dmitriy Sonkin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.