ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022
Charged Small Molecule Binding to Membranes in MD Simulations Evaluated against NMR Experiments.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic urine oversimplification results in misleading membrane fouling mechanisms in bipolar membrane electrodialysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Influence of Membrane Composition on the Passive Membrane Penetration of Industrially Relevant NSO-Heterocycles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- NMR-Derived Salt Bridges in Insulin Analogue: Resolving Artifactual Overbinding in Molecular Dynamics via Charge Scaling.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Effective Inclusion of Electronic Polarization Improves the Description of Electrostatic Interactions: The prosECCo75 Biomolecular Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Evaluating Polarizable Biomembrane Simulations against Experiments.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Molecular assessment of drug-phospholipid interactions consequent to cancer treatment: a study of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Quantitative Comparison against Experiments Reveals Imperfections in Force Fields' Descriptions of POPC-Cholesterol Interactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions of charged molecules with biomembranes regulate many of their biological activities, but their binding affinities to lipid bilayers are difficult to measure experimentally and model theoretically. Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have the potential to capture the complex interactions determining how charged biomolecules interact with membranes, but systematic overbinding of sodium and calcium cations in standard MD simulations raises the question of how accurately force fields capture the interactions between lipid membranes and charged biomolecules. Here, we evaluate the binding of positively charged small molecules, etidocaine, and tetraphenylphosphonium to a phosphatidylcholine (POPC) lipid bilayer using the changes in lipid head-group order parameters. We observed that these molecules behave oppositely to calcium and sodium ions when binding to membranes: (i) their binding affinities are not overestimated by standard force field parameters, (ii) implicit inclusion of electronic polarizability increases their binding affinity, and (iii) they penetrate into the hydrophobic membrane core. Our results can be explained by distinct binding mechanisms of charged small molecules with hydrophobic moieties and monoatomic ions. The binding of the former is driven by hydrophobic effects, while the latter has direct electrostatic interactions with lipids. In addition to elucidating how different kinds of charged biomolecules bind to membranes, we deliver tools for further development of MD simulation parameters and methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.