Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062944›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2022

Implementation and safety evaluation of autoverification for select low-risk, high-volume medications in the emergency department.

Ana Bienvenida, Christian Kroll, Dan Ruhland, Aaron Steffenhagen, Brian W Patterson, Joseph Halfpap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana BienvenidaDepartment of Pharmacy, Legacy Emmanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR.
Christian KrollDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Dan RuhlandDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Aaron SteffenhagenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Brian W PattersonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Joseph HalfpapDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUse of autoverification has decreased in many emergency departments (EDs) with the expansion of emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists. Few studies have evaluated ways to prioritize verification of medications. Here we describe a process to design, implement, and measure the safety of autoverification of low-risk, high-volume medications. SUMMARY: A 3-month retrospective review of medications ordered and administered in the ED generated a list of medications to be considered for autoverification. Concurrently, a novel risk stratification tool was created to identify low-risk medications. Taking these together, medications that were high volume and low risk were considered potentially autoverified medications (PAMs). To evaluate the safety of PAMs, a retrospective review of the ED medication orders placed before implementation of autoverification was performed. A total of 7,433 medication orders were reviewed. Of these, 3,057 orders (41%) were identified as PAMs. EM pharmacists verified 2,982 (97.5%) of the orders without changes. Of the remaining 93 orders that were modified or discontinued and met autoverification criteria, only 2 (0.07%) were identified as potentially inappropriate for autoverification.

conclusionLow-risk, high-volume medications can be safely autoverified in the ED by using a systematic approach to order selection. Using these methods can provide large decreases in verification volume, close to 41%, without compromising patient safety.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicinePharmacistsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRetrospective Studiesautoverificationclinical pharmacy information systemsemergency departmentemergency medicinemedication safetypharmacy practice

Identifiers

PMID36062944
PMCPMC11409936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.