Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062927›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2023

Issues with Tissues: Trends in Tissue-Engineered Products in Clinical Trials in the European Union.

Kieran Joyce, Zaklina Buljovcic, Goran Rosic, Marietta Kaszkin-Bettag, Abhay Pandit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Landscape of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Slovenian Transfusion Medicine: A Review of Past and Future Outlook.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kieran JoyceCÚRAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-9784
Zaklina BuljovcicPharmaLex GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Goran RosicPharmaLex GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Marietta Kaszkin-BettagPharmaLex GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Abhay PanditCÚRAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-4933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-engineered products (TEPs) consist of engineered cells or tissues produced to regenerate, repair, or replace a dysfunctional, diseased, or absent human tissue. TEPs make up <5% of all advanced therapeutic medicinal products (ATMPs) in clinical trials and received 5.1% of ATMP-designated funding in trials in the European Union (EU) in 2019, highlighting the relatively low proportion of TEPs being developed. The realization of TEPs being marketed has yet to be fulfilled, with few products being approved. Since 2009, 90 TEP-based clinical trials have been undertaken in the EU. Of these 90, 25 were Phase I/II trials, 35 were Phase II, 28 were Phase III, and two were Phase IV trials. This review provides an overview of TEPs in development, identifying musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and skin/connective tissue disorders as the main therapeutic areas of interest. Commercial sponsors have funded most trials, and a significantly higher proportion of late-phase trials. Furthermore, this study has identified a shift toward the use of allogeneic cells in TEPs and increased activity in the proportion of early phase trials listed. This indicates a renewed interest in TEP development as sponsors adapt to the new regulation, with prospects of more TEP market authorization applications in the future. Impact Statement Tissue-engineered products (TEPs) consist of engineered cells or tissues produced to regenerate, repair, or replace a dysfunctional, diseased, or absent human tissue. This article evaluates the regulatory landscape of TEPs and identifies the trends in clinical trial activity in the European Union (EU) since the introduction of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007. This article identifies trends in TEP development, highlighting the most active member states, commercial involvement, a shift toward the use of allogeneic cells and a renewed interest in TEP development in recent years.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringClinical Trials as TopicEuropean UnionHumansadvanced therapeutic medicinal productsclinical trialEuropean Uniontissue-engineered product

Identifiers

PMID36062927
PMCPMC9940800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.