ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2023
Issues with Tissues: Trends in Tissue-Engineered Products in Clinical Trials in the European Union.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Adhesion to Decellularized Cardiac Patches of Stem Cells Through Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy (SCFS).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Landscape of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Slovenian Transfusion Medicine: A Review of Past and Future Outlook.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) classification - a case study on spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Pressure Myography and Cardiac Flow Simulator for Mechanical Characterization of Native and Engineered Blood Vessels.Device · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel drug delivery carrier: engineering strategies and clinical safety estimation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Towards a bioengineered airway: advances in tracheal tissue engineering and biofabrication.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Reimbursement routes and past practices for advanced therapy medicinal products in the Netherlands.Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Combining Advanced Therapies with Alternative Treatments: A New Approach to Managing Antimicrobial Resistance?Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The Interface of Gene Editing with Regenerative Medicine.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Assessing the landscape of clinical and observational trials involving bioprinting: a scoping review.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Biomaterials in tissue repair and regeneration: key insights from extracellular matrix biology.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
- Article
- Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development.World journal of stem cells · 2024Review
- Global trends in clinical trials involving engineered biomaterials.Science advances · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Functionalized Electrospun Membranes for Periodontal Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Cell-based medicinal products approved in the European Union: current evidence and perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue-engineered products (TEPs) consist of engineered cells or tissues produced to regenerate, repair, or replace a dysfunctional, diseased, or absent human tissue. TEPs make up <5% of all advanced therapeutic medicinal products (ATMPs) in clinical trials and received 5.1% of ATMP-designated funding in trials in the European Union (EU) in 2019, highlighting the relatively low proportion of TEPs being developed. The realization of TEPs being marketed has yet to be fulfilled, with few products being approved. Since 2009, 90 TEP-based clinical trials have been undertaken in the EU. Of these 90, 25 were Phase I/II trials, 35 were Phase II, 28 were Phase III, and two were Phase IV trials. This review provides an overview of TEPs in development, identifying musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and skin/connective tissue disorders as the main therapeutic areas of interest. Commercial sponsors have funded most trials, and a significantly higher proportion of late-phase trials. Furthermore, this study has identified a shift toward the use of allogeneic cells in TEPs and increased activity in the proportion of early phase trials listed. This indicates a renewed interest in TEP development as sponsors adapt to the new regulation, with prospects of more TEP market authorization applications in the future. Impact Statement Tissue-engineered products (TEPs) consist of engineered cells or tissues produced to regenerate, repair, or replace a dysfunctional, diseased, or absent human tissue. This article evaluates the regulatory landscape of TEPs and identifies the trends in clinical trial activity in the European Union (EU) since the introduction of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007. This article identifies trends in TEP development, highlighting the most active member states, commercial involvement, a shift toward the use of allogeneic cells and a renewed interest in TEP development in recent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.