Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062906›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Deep learning-based feature extraction for prediction and interpretation of sharp-wave ripples in the rodent hippocampus.

Andrea Navas-Olive, Rodrigo Amaducci, Maria-Teresa Jurado-Parras, Enrique R Sebastian, Liset M de la Prida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Behavioral Timing of Interictal Spikes, But Not Rate, Correlates with Impaired Working Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea Navas-Olive *Instituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Rodrigo Amaducci *Grupo de Neurocomputación Biológica (GNB), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Maria-Teresa Jurado-ParrasInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique R SebastianInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Liset M de la PridaInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0160-6472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local field potential (LFP) deflections and oscillations define hippocampal sharp-wave ripples (SWRs), one of the most synchronous events of the brain. SWRs reflect firing and synaptic current sequences emerging from cognitively relevant neuronal ensembles. While spectral analysis have permitted advances, the surge of ultra-dense recordings now call for new automatic detection strategies. Here, we show how one-dimensional convolutional networks operating over high-density LFP hippocampal recordings allowed for automatic identification of SWR from the rodent hippocampus. When applied without retraining to new datasets and ultra-dense hippocampus-wide recordings, we discovered physiologically relevant processes associated to the emergence of SWR, prompting for novel classification criteria. To gain interpretability, we developed a method to interrogate the operation of the artificial network. We found it relied in feature-based specialization, which permit identification of spatially segregated oscillations and deflections, as well as synchronous population firing typical of replay. Thus, using deep learning-based approaches may change the current heuristic for a better mechanistic interpretation of these relevant neurophysiological events.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRodentiaAnimalsHippocampusNeuronsconvolutional neural networksdorsoventralhippocampusmouseNeuropixelsneuroscienceratripples

Identifiers

PMID36062906
PMCPMC9560163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.