ArticleJournal of medical screening2022
Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer: A comparison of international guidelines on prostate-specific antigen testing.
Article in Journal of medical screening, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline of guidelines: a critical appraisal of the evidence for PSA retesting intervals.BJU international · 2025Pooled it
- Development and pilot testing of a prostate cancer polygenic risk report.BMC medical genomics · 2026Trial
- The prevalence and predictors of previous prostate cancer screening among men attending primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Rural-urban disparities in prostate-specific antigen testing and shared decision-making in the US.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Genomic risk model to implement precision prostate cancer screening in clinical care: the ProGRESS study.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Homologous recombination repair and breast cancer gene testing in prostate cancer: expert perspectives and practical guidance on best practice from sample acquisition to biomarker-informed clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density in patients suspected of having prostate cancer in South Korea: A large, multi-institutional registry.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
- Prostate specific antigen retesting intervals and trends in England: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Association of Serum PSA, fPSA, and CEA Levels with Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Prostate Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer screening with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing: A retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Designing a Simple Electrochemical Genosensor for the Detection of Urinary PCA3, a Prostate Cancer Biomarker.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Guidelines by Urologists and Public Health Professionals: Different Perspectives on Prostate Specific Antigen Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.BMJ oncology · 2023Review
- Feasibility of Recruitment, Perceived Genetic Risk and Susceptibility Beliefs, and Saliva Sample Collection in a Community-Based Prostate Cancer Genetic Risk Pilot Study.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo summarise and compare the key recommendations on prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer, and so highlight where more evidence is required to facilitate consistent recommendations.
methodsThe Medline database and websites of 18 national screening organisations and professional associations were searched between January 2010 and November 2020 to identify screening guidelines published in English, considering recent clinical trials.
resultsPopulation-based PSA testing of asymptomatic men is not widely recommended. Guidelines emphasize shared patient-clinician decision making. For 'average-risk' men choosing to be screened, the recommended age varies from 50-55 to 70 years, alongside consideration of life expectancy (ranging from 7-15 years). Screening intervals, when specified, are biennial (most common), annual, or determined from baseline PSA. The earliest age for screening high-risk men (frequently defined as of African descent or with a family history of prostate cancer) is 40 years, but recommendations often defer to clinical judgement.
conclusionsPopulation screening of asymptomatic men is not widely recommended. Instead, balancing the potential harms and benefits of PSA testing is endorsed. Variation between guidelines stems from differing interpretations of key trials and could lead to clinician-dependent screening views. The development of clinical decision aids and international consensus on guidelines may help reduce national and international variation on how men are counselled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.