ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022
Muscle preactivation and the limits of muscle power output during jumping in the Cuban tree frog Osteopilus septentrionalis.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative muscle anatomy of the anuran pelvis and hindlimb in relation to locomotor mode.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Beyond power limits: the kinetic energy capacity of skeletal muscle.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Review
- Evidence for multi-scale power amplification in skeletal muscle.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Muscle-tendon unit design and tuning for power enhancement, power attenuation, and reduction of metabolic cost.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies of jumping in frogs have found power outputs in excess of what is possible from direct application of muscle power and concluded that jumping requires the storage and release of elastic strain energy. Of course, the muscles must produce the work required and their power output should be consistent with known muscle properties if the total duration of muscle activity is known. Using the Cuban tree frog, Osteopilus septentrionalis, I measured jumping performance from kinematics and used EMG measurements of three major jumping muscles to determine the duration of muscle activity. Using the total mass of all the hindlimb muscles, muscle mass-specific work output up to 60 J kg-1 was recorded. Distributed over the duration of the jump, both average and peak muscle mass-specific power output increased approximately linearly with the work done, reaching values of over 750 and 2000 W kg-1, respectively. However, the muscles were activated before the jump started. Both preactivation duration and EMG amplitude increased with increasing amounts of work performed. Assuming the muscles could produce work from EMG onset until toe-off, the average muscle mass-specific power over this longer interval also increased with work done, but only up to a work output of 36 J kg-1. The mean power above this value of work was 281 W kg-1, which is approximately 65% of the estimated maximum isotonic power. Several reasons are put forward for suggesting this power output, although within the known properties of the muscles, is nevertheless an impressive achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.