ArticleStatistics in medicine2022
Identifying surrogate markers in real-world comparative effectiveness research.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible evaluation of surrogate markers with Bayesian model averaging.Statistics in medicine · 2024Trial
- Assessing surrogate heterogeneity in real world data using meta-learners.Journal of causal inference · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In comparative effectiveness research (CER), leveraging short-term surrogates to infer treatment effects on long-term outcomes can guide policymakers evaluating new treatments. Numerous statistical procedures for identifying surrogates have been proposed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but no methods currently exist to evaluate the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained by surrogates in real-world data (RWD), which have become increasingly common. To address this knowledge gap, we propose inverse probability weighted (IPW) and doubly robust (DR) estimators of an optimal transformation of the surrogate and the corresponding PTE measure. We demonstrate that the proposed estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, and the DR estimator is consistent when either the propensity score model or outcome regression model is correctly specified. Our proposed estimators are evaluated through extensive simulation studies. In two RWD settings, we show that our method can identify and validate surrogate markers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.