ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2022
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Clinical Translation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI: Acquisition and Analysis Consensus Recommendations.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models for preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Combined hematology, tumor morphology, and magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Histogram analysis of IVIM MRI for differentiating glioma IDH-1 status, grade, and Ki-67 expression: a comparison of bi-exponential models at multiple B-value.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion (2024 edition).Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Review
- [Application and prospects of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis and evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024Review
- Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion: new insights into personalized therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Detecting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using the impeded diffusion fraction technique to sense macromolecular coordinated water.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Preoperative evaluation of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma with a radiological feature-based nomogram: a bi-centre study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Radiomics analysis of R2* maps to predict early recurrence of single hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a major risk factor for the early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and it seriously worsens the prognosis. Accurate preoperative evaluation of the presence of MVI could greatly benefit the treatment management and prognosis prediction of HCC patients. The study aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantitative parameter for the preoperative diagnosis MVI in HCC patients. Methods: Original articles about diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and/or intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) conducted on a 3.0 or 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system indexed through January 17, 2021were collected from MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated, and meta-regression analysis was performed using a bivariate random effects model through a meta-analysis. Results: Nine original articles with a total of 988 HCCs were included. Most studies had low bias risk and minimal applicability concerns. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the ADC value were 73%, 70%, and 0.78, respectively. The time interval between the index test and the reference standard was identified as a possible source of heterogeneity by subgroup meta-regression analysis. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed that the ADC value had moderate accuracy for predicting MVI in HCC. The time interval accounted for the heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.