Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062118›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

"How PrEPared are you?": Knowledge of and attitudes toward PrEP among overseas-born and newly arrived gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Australia.

Budiadi Sudarto, Eric P F Chow, Nicholas Medland, Christopher K Fairley, Edwina J Wright, Jude Armishaw, Brian Price, Tiffany R Phillips, Jason J Ong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Budiadi SudartoCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eric P F ChowCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas MedlandCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Christopher K FairleyCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Edwina J WrightThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jude ArmishawDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brian PriceDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tiffany R PhillipsCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jason J OngCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUMelbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUAlfred Health · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Overseas-born and newly arrived gay and bisexual men and men who have sex with men (GBMSM) are at higher risk of acquiring HIV in comparison to Australian-born GBMSM. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is subsidized by the Australian government under Medicare, Australia's universal health insurance scheme, however many members of this population are Medicare-ineligible, which could prevent them from accessing PrEP. We wanted to explore participants' knowledge of and attitudes toward PrEP and their opinions of new PrEP modalities, namely injectable PrEP and PrEP implants. Methods: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews between February 2021 to September 2021 with 22 overseas-born, newly arrived (<5 years in Australia) GBMSM of varying PrEP use. We asked their opinions of PrEP and their preferences of new PrEP modalities. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis to interpret the data. Results: Participants' views reflect the intersections between systemic factors, such as Medicare ineligibility and the high cost of PrEP, with socio-cultural factors, such as lack of knowledge about PrEP, internalized stigma stemming from homo- and sex-negativity, and stigmatizing attitudes toward PrEP and PrEP users. For participants who were on PrEP, being community connected, having a positive relationship with doctors and nurses, and being informed of the option to purchase PrEP from overseas pharmacies at a low cost helped them to overcome some of these barriers. Additionally, there was a strong preference for injectable PrEP but not PrEP implants. Participants stressed the importance of providing a comprehensive information about PrEP specific to this population and to make PrEP free for all. Conclusions: We concluded that resources about PrEP specific to this population that address both systemic and socio-cultural factors are needed, and for these resources to be available in languages other than English. This is to coincide with on-going advocacy to increase the capacity of publicly funded sexual health clinics to provide multilingual PrEP services for people without Medicare, and to make PrEP free for all. These combined strategies have the potential to increase PrEP knowledge and uptake among this population.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesAgedAustraliaHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNational Health ProgramsGBMSMHIVHIV preventionintersecting barriersnewly arrivedoverseas-bornPrEP

Identifiers

PMID36062118
PMCPMC9437584
OpenAlexW4292332517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.