Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062013›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy.

Xinping Lin, Xiaohan Zheng, Juan Zhang, Xiaoli Cui, Daizu Zou, Zheng Zhao, Xiding Pan, Qiong Jie, Yuezhang Wu, Runze Qiu and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xinping LinSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaohan ZhengSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Juan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Yuhua Hospital, Yuhua Branch of Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoli CuiDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Yuhua Hospital, Yuhua Branch of Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Daizu ZouSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Zheng ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiding PanDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiong JieDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuezhang WuDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Runze QiuDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Junshan ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nihong ChenDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Li TangDepartment of Pharmacy, Yixing Cancer Hospital, Yixing, China.
Chun GeDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jianjun ZouDepartment of Pharmacy Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Futile recanalization occurs when the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a technical success but fails to achieve a favorable outcome. This study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop a pre-EVT model and a post-EVT model to predict the risk of futile recanalization and to provide meaningful insights to assess the prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization. Methods: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing EVT at the National Advanced Stroke Center of Nanjing First Hospital (China) between April 2017 and May 2021 were analyzed. The baseline characteristics and peri-interventional characteristics were assessed using four ML algorithms. The predictive performance was evaluated by the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic and calibration curve. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach and partial dependence plot were introduced to understand the relative importance and the influence of a single feature. Results: A total of 312 patients were included in this study. Of the four ML models that include baseline characteristics, the "Early" XGBoost had a better performance {AUC, 0.790 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.677-0.903]; Brier, 0.191}. Subsequent inclusion of peri-interventional characteristics into the "Early" XGBoost showed that the "Late" XGBoost performed better [AUC, 0.910 (95% CI, 0.837-0.984); Brier, 0.123]. NIHSS after 24 h, age, groin to recanalization, and the number of passages were the critical prognostic factors associated with futile recanalization, and the SHAP approach shows that NIHSS after 24 h ranks first in relative importance. Conclusions: The "Early" XGBoost and the "Late" XGBoost allowed us to predict futile recanalization before and after EVT accurately. Our study suggests that including peri-interventional characteristics may lead to superior predictive performance compared to a model based on baseline characteristics only. In addition, NIHSS after 24 h was the most important prognostic factor for futile recanalization.

Indexed as

endovascular thrombectomyfutile recanalizationlarge vessel occlusionmachine learningpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID36062013
PMCPMC9437637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.