Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061972›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery.

Philipp Anders, Lisa-Marie Anders, Adel Barbara, Nora Szentmary, Achim Langenbucher, Zisis Gatzioufas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes after corneal refractive surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philipp AndersInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-9043
Lisa-Marie AndersInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Adel BarbaraIVISION Laser Refractive Center, Haifa, Israel.
Nora SzentmaryDr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Congenital Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Achim LangenbucherExperimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Zisis GatzioufasInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation after corneal refractive surgery (CRS) becomes an expanding challenge for ophthalmologists as more and more cataract surgeries after CRS are required. These patients typically also have high expectations as to visual performance. Conventional IOL power calculation schemes frequently provide inaccurate results in these cases. This review aims to summarize and recommend currently available IOL power calculation methods for eyes with the most common CRS methods: radial keratotomy (RK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser

Indexed as

cataractcataract extractioncorneal surgeryexcimer laserIOL powerIOL power miscalculationkeratometryLASIKPRKrefractive surgeryRKSMILE

Identifiers

PMID36061972
PMCPMC9434667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.