Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061964›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2022

Root Morphology and Canal Configuration of Permanent Canines Among Saudi Population: Systematic Review and Comparison with Worldwide Studies.

Abdulaziz A Asiri, Khalil W AlQahtani, Mohammed Y Tarrosh, Amal S Shaiban, Hamed A Al Shawkani, Wafa H Alaajam, Maryam S Bamasud, Muqbil Alqahtani, Mohanad A Alyousefy, Mohammed M Al Moaleem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of Root Canal Characteristics in Permanent Canine Teeth Among 270 Saudi Subjects: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulaziz A AsiriEndodontic Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalil W AlQahtaniEndodontic Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Y TarroshDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Amal S ShaibanDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Hamed A Al ShawkaniDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Wafa H AlaajamDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Maryam S BamasudDental Department, Ministry of Health, Sakaka City, Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia.
Muqbil AlqahtaniGeneral Practitioner, King Faisal University, Alhafuf City, Saudi Arabia.
Mohanad A AlyousefyDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Mohammed M Al MoaleemDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-261X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The root morphology and canal configuration (RMCC) of mandibular and maxillary canines among Saudi population is systematically reviewed and compared with international studies in this research. Methods: This study was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The electronic databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Wiley Library, Google website search, and Web of Science were searched. Only local and international cross-sectional, comparative, evaluation, and validation studies or case reports published between 2016 and 2022 that directly evaluated canine RMCC and assessed participants using cone beam computed tomography were included. Results: Forty-three studies that investigated RMCCs (17 local and 26 international) were involved in this review. The original Saudi research recorded that almost 100% of maxillary canines had one root and one canal, whereas 98.4% and 94.1% had one root and one canal in the mandibular arch. Vertucci's class I had the highest percentages in the maxillary and mandibular arches at 98.3% and 95.8%, respectively, followed by class III with 0.7% and 1.9% for the same arches, respectively. International studies recorded that 100% of maxillary canines had one canal and root; the percentages of the mandibular arch were 92.3 and 98% for single canal and root, respectively; and the highest percentage was obtained by Vertucci's class I (91.1%), followed by class III (4.7%). Conclusion: This review reports and confirmed the symmetry of the RMCCs of maxillary and mandibular canines between Saudi studies and other populations. Moreover, Vertucci's classes I and III were the most frequent RMCCs, and two-rooted canines in both arches were considerably less frequently than single-rooted ones.

Indexed as

canal configurationmandibular caninemaxillary caninenumber of canalsnumber of rootsroot morphologySaudi populationVertucci’s classification

Identifiers

PMID36061964
PMCPMC9439648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.