Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061953›Full record

ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2016

Sensitivity to model structure: a comparison of compartmental models in epidemiology.

Sheetal Prakash Silal, Francesca Little, Karen I Barnes, Lisa Jane White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drivers of the likelihood of evolutionary rescue in response to novel infectious diseases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sheetal Prakash SilalDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Francesca LittleDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Karen I BarnesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lisa Jane WhiteMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 214236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compartmental models have provided a framework for understanding disease transmission dynamics for over 100 years. The predictions from these models are often policy relevant and need to be robust to model assumptions, parameter values and model structure. A selection of compartmental models with the same parameter values but different model structures (ranging from simple structures to complex ones) were compared in the absence and presence of several policy interventions to assess sensitivity to model structure. Models were fitted to data to assess if this might reduce this sensitivity. The compartmental models produced wide-ranging estimates of outcome measures but when fitted to data, the estimates obtained were robust to model structure. This finding suggests that there may be an argument for selecting simple models over complex ones, but the complexity of the model should be determined by the purpose of the model and the use to which it will be put.

Indexed as

differential equationsmathematical modellingsensitivity testing

Identifiers

PMID36061953
PMCPMC7613485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.