Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061814›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Increasing access and uptake of SARS-CoV-2 at-home tests using a community-engaged approach.

Emily M D'Agostino, Giselle Corbie, Warren A Kibbe, Christoph P Hornik, Al Richmond, Angella Dunston, Allyn Damman, Lisa Wruck, Manuel Alvarado, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily M D'AgostinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Giselle CorbieDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Warren A KibbeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Al RichmondCommunity-Campus Partnerships for Health, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Angella DunstonCommunity-Campus Partnerships for Health, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Allyn DammanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Lisa WruckDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Manuel AlvaradoUnited Way of Merced County, Merced, CA, United States.
Michael Cohen-WolkowiezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

RADx-UP SAY YES COVID Test Study (S4)U24MD016258 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL, DAVE, GAURAV J · 2020 to 2023
$116.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD016258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequalities around COVID-19 testing and vaccination persist in the U.S. health system. We investigated whether a community-engaged approach could be used to distribute free, at-home, rapid SARS-CoV-2 tests to underserved populations. Between November 18-December 31, 2021, 400,000 tests were successfully distributed via 67 community partners and a mobile unit to a majority Hispanic/Latino/Spanish population in Merced County, California. Testing before gathering (59 %) was the most common testing reason. Asians versus Whites were more likely to test for COVID-19 if they had close contact with someone who may have been positive (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-6.7). Minors versus adults were more likely to test if they had close contact with someone who was confirmed positive (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI = 1.0-3.0), whereas Asian (OR = 4.1, 95 % CI = 1.2-13.7) and Hispanic/Latino/Spanish (OR = 2.5, 95 % CI = 1.0-6.6) versus White individuals were more likely to test if they had a positive household member. Asians versus Whites were more likely to receive a positive test result. Minors were less likely than adults to have been vaccinated (OR = 0.2, 95 % CI = 0.1-0.3). Among unvaccinated individuals, those who completed the survey in English versus Spanish indicated they were more likely to get vaccinated in the future (OR = 8.2, 95 % CI = 1.5-44.4). Asians versus Whites were less likely to prefer accessing oral COVID medications from a pharmacy/drug store only compared with a doctor's office or community setting (OR = 0.3, 95 % CI = 0.2-0.6). Study findings reinforce the need for replicable and scalable community-engaged strategies for reducing COVID-19 disparities by increasing SARS-CoV-2 test and vaccine access and uptake.

Indexed as

Community engagementCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2TestingUnderserved populationsYMCF, You & Me COVID-Free

Identifiers

PMID36061814
PMCPMC9424120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.