Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061778›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Mechanism of cotton resistance to abiotic stress, and recent research advances in the osmoregulation related genes.

Shah Saud, Lichen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. The Gibberellin 2-Oxidase GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome-Wide Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Identification and Analysis of the Plasma Membrane HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shah SaudCollege of Life Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi, China.
Lichen WangCollege of Life Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stress is an important factor affecting the normal growth and development of plants and crop yield. To reduce the impact of abiotic adversity on cotton growth and development, the material basis of cotton resistance and its physiological functions are analyzed at the molecular level. At the same time, the use of genetic engineering methods to recombine resistance genes has become a hot spot in cotton resistance research. This paper provides an overviews of the resistance mechanism of cotton against the threat of non-biological adversity, as well as the research progress of osmoregulation-related genes, protein-acting genes, and transcription regulatory factor genes in recent years, and outlines the explored gene resources in cotton resistance genetic engineering, with the aim to provide ideas and reference bases for future research on cotton resistance.

Indexed as

cottongene cloningmolecular markerresistanceresource exploration

Identifiers

PMID36061778
PMCPMC9428623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.