Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061747›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Effects of exogenous calcium on the drought response of the tea plant (

Lyudmila S Malyukova, Natalia G Koninskaya, Yuriy L Orlov, Lidiia S Samarina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of Multi-Perspectives in Tea Breeding and the Main Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lyudmila S MalyukovaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Natalia G KoninskayaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Yuriy L OrlovAgrarian and Technological Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0587-1609
Lidiia S SamarinaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drought is one of the major factors reducing the yield of many crops worldwide, including the tea crop ( Methods: Experiments were conducted using 3-year-old potted tea plants of the best local cultivar Kolkhida. Application of ammonium nitrate (control treatment) or calcium nitrate (Ca treatment) to the soil was performed before drought induction. Next, a 7-day drought was induced in both groups of plants. The following physiological parameters were measured: relative electrical conductivity, pH of cell sap, and concentrations of cations, sugars, and amino acids. In addition, relative expression levels of 40 stress-related and crop quality-related genes were analyzed. Results: Under drought stress, leaf electrolyte leakage differed significantly, indicating greater damage to cell membranes in control plants than in Ca-treated plants. Calcium application resulted in greater pH of cell sap; higher accumulation of tyrosine, methionine, and valine; and a greater Mg

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisCalciumDroughtsTeaCalciumTeaDrought stressExogenous calciumPlant physiologyPlant transcription factorsTea plant

Identifiers

PMID36061747
PMCPMC9435517
OpenAlexW4293425672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.