Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061598›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Continuous theta burst stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Sofie Carrette, Paul Boon, Debby Klooster, Annelies Van Dycke, Evelien Carrette, Marijke Miatton, Robrecht Raedt, Jean Delbeke, Alfred Meurs, Kristl Vonck

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02635633 (Continuous Thetaburst Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy - Safety, Feasibility and Proof-of-concept), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02635633 naterminatednot on this map

Continuous Thetaburst Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy - Safety, Feasibility and Proof-of-concept

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2015 to 2018Enrolled7ConditionsEpilepsies, PartialArmscontinuous thetaburst stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofie CarretteDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Paul BoonDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Debby KloosterDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Annelies Van DyckeDepartment of Neurology, Sint-Jan General Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
Evelien CarretteDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marijke MiattonDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Robrecht RaedtDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean DelbekeDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Alfred MeursDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristl VonckDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have anti-epileptic effects, especially in patients with neocortical lesions. Initial clinical trials demonstrated that the duration of the seizure reducing effect is relatively short-lived. In the context of a chronic condition like epilepsy, theta burst stimulation (TBS) may represent a potential solution in optimizing treatment practicality and durability as it was demonstrated to be associated with longer-lasting after-effects. TBS has been studied extensively in diverse neuropsychiatric conditions, but a therapeutic TBS protocol has not previously been applied in epilepsy patients. Materials and methods: We performed a prospective open-label pilot study of 4-day accelerated continuous TBS (cTBS) treatment in patients with neocortical drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). A treatment session consisted of 5 cTBS trains, each comprising 600 pulses presented in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 ms, delivered at 10-min intertrain-intervals, targeted over the epileptic focus (EF) using a neuronavigation-guided figure-of-8 coil. Safety and feasibility, and seizure frequency were assessed as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively, over a 4-week baseline period, a 1-week treatment period and a 7-week follow-up period, using adverse event logging, electro-encephalography, cognitive, and psychological questionnaires and a seizure diary kept by the patients and/or caregivers. Results: Seven subjects (4M:3F; median age 48, interquartile ranges 25) underwent the treatment protocol. Adverse events were reported in all subjects but were mild and transient. No clinical or electrographic seizures were evoked during or immediately following stimulation. No deterioration was found in cognition nor in psycho-emotional well-being following treatment. Treatment burden was acceptable, but seems to depend on clinical effect, duration of ongoing effect and stimulation site. Median weekly seizure frequency and ratio of seizure-free weeks did not change significantly in this small patient cohort. Conclusion: We report the results of the first ever trial of cTBS as a treatment for neocortical DRE. A 4-day accelerated cTBS protocol over the EF appears safe and feasible. Although the design and sample size of this open-label pilot study is unfit to reliably identify a therapeutic effect, results encourage further exploration of cTBS as an anti-epileptic treatment and potential optimization compared to conventional rTMS in a dedicated randomized controlled trial. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02635633).

Indexed as

epilepsyneurostimulationsafetytheta burst stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation (repetitive)treatment

Identifiers

PMID36061598
PMCPMC9433314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.