Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Focal non-invasive deep-brain stimulation with temporal interference for the suppression of epileptic biomarkers.

Emma Acerbo, Aude Jegou, Charlotte Luff, Patrycja Dzialecka, Boris Botzanowski, Florian Missey, Ibrahima Ngom, Stanislas Lagarde, Fabrice Bartolomei, Antonino Cassara and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980090 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Neural Mechanisms of Interpersonal Expectations on Negative Affect

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeRan2025 to 2028Enrolled196ConditionsNegative Affectivity, Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Placebo Effect, ExpectationsArmsSession A: Positive Placebo + Active tTIS, Session B: Positive Placebo + Sham tTIS, Session C: Negative Placebo + Active tTIS, Session D: Negative Placebo + Sham tTIS, Session E: On-Placebo + Sham tTIS
NCT07434986 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Overnight Temporal Interference Stimulation of Bilateral Hippocampi to Reduce Epileptogenic Biomarkers and Improve Sleep in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsTemporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE), Drug Resistant Epilepsy, SleepArmsNon-invasive Temporal Interference (TI) Stimulation Targeting Bilateral Hippocampi
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporal Interference Stimulation Enhances Neural Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Virtual brain twins for stimulation in epilepsy.Nature computational science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Precision non-invasive brain stimulation: anJournal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emma AcerboAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Aude JegouAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Charlotte LuffDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Patrycja DzialeckaDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Boris BotzanowskiAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Florian MisseyAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Ibrahima NgomAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Stanislas LagardeAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Fabrice BartolomeiAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Antonino CassaraFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Esra NeufeldFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Viktor JirsaAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Romain CarronAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Nir GrossmanDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adam WilliamsonAix Marseille University:, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neurostimulation applied from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes is an effective therapeutic intervention in patients suffering from intractable drug-resistant epilepsy when resective surgery is contraindicated or failed. Inhibitory DBS to suppress seizures and associated epileptogenic biomarkers could be performed with high-frequency stimulation (HFS), typically between 100 and 165 Hz, to various deep-seated targets, such as the Mesio-temporal lobe (MTL), which leads to changes in brain rhythms, specifically in the hippocampus. The most prominent alterations concern high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), namely an increase in ripples, a reduction in pathological Fast Ripples (FRs), and a decrease in pathological interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). Materials and methods: In the current study, we use Temporal Interference (TI) stimulation to provide a non-invasive DBS (130 Hz) of the MTL, specifically the hippocampus, in both mouse models of epilepsy, and scale the method using human cadavers to demonstrate the potential efficacy in human patients. Simulations for both mice and human heads were performed to calculate the best coordinates to reach the hippocampus. Results: This non-invasive DBS increases physiological ripples, and decreases the number of FRs and IEDs in a mouse model of epilepsy. Similarly, we show the inability of 130 Hz transcranial current stimulation (TCS) to achieve similar results. We therefore further demonstrate the translatability to human subjects Significance: These results constitute the first proof of the feasibility and efficiency of TI to stimulate at depth an area without impacting the surrounding tissue. The data tend to show the sufficiently focal character of the induced effects and suggest promising therapeutic applications in epilepsy.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulationepilepsymouse modelnon-invasive stimulationtemporal interference

Identifiers

PMID36061593
PMCPMC9431367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.