ArticleYonago acta medica2022
Risk Factors of Free Flap Complications in Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Yonago acta medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence of flap-related complications in the oral reconstruction area after free flap reconstruction in patients with oral cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Validation of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) for Predicting Leakage and Surgical Complications After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Microvascular Anastomosis of Calcified Vessels in a Patient with Hyperlipidemia: Meeting the Challenges and Dealing withIndian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025Article
- Hand Reconstruction Using Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap by Terminal Perforator-to-Digital Artery Anastomosis: Retrospective Analysis.Archives of plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although head and neck reconstruction using free flaps has become a common procedure, flap complications remain a concern. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of free flap complications and to identify the causes of these complications. Methods: We studied 97 patients with head and neck cancer with intraoral defects who underwent reconstruction using free flaps at Tottori University Hospital between 2011 and 2020. We used a retrospective cohort study design to investigate whether flap complications, including flap necrosis (total and partial) and flap dehiscence, were related to various factors, including the underlying disease condition, treatment status, and surgical factors. Results: Of the 97 patients analyzed, total flap necrosis was observed in one patient (1.0%). The incidence rate of flap complications, including flap necrosis and flap dehiscence, was 29.9%. When the time taken to perform one vascular anastomosis, including preparation of the recipient vessel and flap vessel, exceeded 30 min, the incidence rates of flap necrosis (total and partial) (odds ratio, 8.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-36.00; Conclusion: The time taken to perform one vessel anastomosis was the factor that contributed the most to the incidence of flap complications. Reconstructive surgeons should reduce the incidence of flap complications by keeping the known risk factors of the surgery in mind and by aiming to complete a vascular anastomosis time, including the time taken for the preparation of vessels, of ≤ 30 min per vessel during surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.