Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061572›Full record

ReviewYonago acta medica2022

Forensic Medicine in South Asia: Comparison to the Developed Countries.

Dawa Zangpo, Morio Iino, Masato Nakatome, Motoo Yoshimiya, Norbu Norbu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yonago acta medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular autopsy for sudden death in Japan.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawa ZangpoDivision of Forensic Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Morio IinoDivision of Forensic Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Masato NakatomeDivision of Forensic Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Motoo YoshimiyaDivision of Forensic Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Norbu NorbuDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Jigme Dorji Wangchuk National Referral Hospital, Thimphu 11001, Bhutan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study attempted to discuss the historical context and current practice of forensic medicine in South Asia. Comparisons within and between countries in South Asia, and between South Asia and the developed countries (represented by Japan and the USA) have been made to provide an insight into their distinct practice of forensic medicine. Though the formal establishment of forensic medicine in South Asia commenced at a comparable period to the developed countries, their pace of development has been considerably slow. Moreover, their ways of practice as well have evolved differently. In effect, South Asian countries follow an 'integrated service' system, whilst Japan and the USA practice 'divided service' systems to provide forensic medical services. Similarly, regarding the death investigations, most South Asian countries follow a Police-led death investigation system, whereas Japan and the USA follow a hybrid model and the Medical examiner's system of death investigation, respectively. Indeed, forensic medicine in South Asia is undeniably underdeveloped. In this paper, by highlighting the issues and challenges confronted in South Asia, key actions for prompt redressal are discussed to improve the standard of forensic medical services in South Asia.

Indexed as

death investigation systemforensic medicinemedicolegal systemSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID36061572
PMCPMC9419216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.