Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061555›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry.

Antonio Maria Leone, Stefano Migliaro, Giuseppe Zimbardo, Pio Cialdella, Eloisa Basile, Domenico Galante, Federico Di Giusto, Gianluca Anastasia, Andrea Vicere, Edoardo Petrolati and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05056662 (Post-Revascularization Optimization and PHysiological Evaluation of intermediaTe Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05056662 unknown statusnot on this map

Post-Revascularization Optimization and PHysiological Evaluation of intermediaTe Lesions: an FFR-based Single Center Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsIschemic Heart Disease, Angina, Stable, Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsInvasive functional evaluation with either Pd/Pa, FFR, iFR or contrast FFR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effectiveness and clinical impact of functional post-PCI optimization-a systematic review and individual patient-data meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Antonio Maria LeoneDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Stefano MigliaroDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ZimbardoPoliclinico Casilino, Rome, Italy.
Pio CialdellaPoliclinico Casilino, Rome, Italy.
Eloisa BasileDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Domenico GalanteDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Federico Di GiustoDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca AnastasiaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Andrea VicereDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo PetrolatiDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Di StefanoDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia CampanielloDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Domenico D'AmarioDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Rocco VergalloDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Rocco Antonio MontoneDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Antonino BuffonDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Enrico RomagnoliDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Cristina AurigemmaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Francesco BurzottaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Carlo TraniDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Filippo CreaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While the importance of invasive physiological assessment (IPA) to choose coronary lesions to be treated is ascertained, its role after PCI is less established. We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of Physiology-guided PCI in the everyday practice in a retrospective registry performed in a single high-volume and "physiology-believer" center. Materials and methods: The PROPHET-FFR study (NCT05056662) patients undergoing an IPA in 2015-2020 were retrospectively enrolled in three groups: Control group comprising patients for whom PCI was deferred based on a IPA; Angiography-Guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA but without a post-PCI IPA; Physiology-guided PCI group comprising patients undergoing PCI based on an IPA and an IPA after PCI, followed by a physiology-guided optimization, if indicated. Optimal result was defined by an FFR value ≥ 0.90. Results: A total of 1,322 patients with 1,591 lesions were available for the analysis. 893 patients (67.5%) in Control Group, 249 patients (18.8%) in Angiography-guided PCI Group and 180 patients (13.6%) in Physiology-guided PCI group. In 89 patients a suboptimal functional result was achieved that was optimized in 22 cases leading to a "Final FFR" value of 0.90 ± 0.04 in Angiography-Guided PCI group. Procedural time, costs, and rate of complications were similar. At follow up the rate of MACEs for the Physiology-guided PCI group was similar to the Control Group (7.2% vs. 8.2%, Conclusion: "Physiology-guided PCI" is a feasible strategy with a favorable impact on mid-term prognosis. Prospective studies using a standardized IPA are warrant to confirm these data.

Indexed as

FFRfunction based management CCS (chronic coronary syndrome)PCIphysiology-guided optimizationpost-PCI evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36061555
PMCPMC9433711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.