Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061418›Full record

ArticleApplied soft computing2022

Handling class imbalance in COVID-19 chest X-ray images classification: Using SMOTE and weighted loss.

Ekram Chamseddine, Nesrine Mansouri, Makram Soui, Mourad Abed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied soft computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Improved outcome models with denoising diffusion.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ekram ChamseddineSIME Laboratory, National School of Engineers of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunisia.
Nesrine MansouriArtificial Intelligence Research Unit, National School of Computer Sciences, University of Manouba, Tunisia.
Makram SouiCollege of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Saudi Arabia.
Mourad AbedLAMIH, Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide have been struggling since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The early diagnosis of this unprecedented infection has become their ultimate objective. Detecting positive patients from chest X-ray images is a quick and efficient solution for overloaded hospitals. Many studies based on deep learning (DL) techniques have shown high performance in classifying COVID-19 chest X-ray images. However, most of these studies suffer from a class imbalance problem mainly due to the limited number of COVID-19 samples. Such a problem may significantly reduce the efficiency of DL classifiers. In this work, we aim to build an accurate model that assists clinicians in the early diagnosis of COVID-19 using balanced data. To this end, we trained six state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) via transfer learning (TL) on three different COVID-19 datasets. The models were developed to perform a multi-classification task that distinguishes between COVID-19, normal, and viral pneumonia cases. To address the class imbalance issue, we first investigated the Weighted Categorical Loss (WCL) and then the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) on each dataset separately. After a comparative study of the obtained results, we selected the model that achieved high classification results in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, and AUC compared to other recent works. DenseNet201 and VGG-19 claimed the best scores. With an accuracy of 98.87%, an F1_Score of 98.21%, a sensitivity of 98.86%, a specificity of 99.43%, a precision of 100%, and an AUC of 99.15%, the WCL combined with CheXNet outperformed the other examined models.

Indexed as

Chest X-ray imagesClassificationCOVID-19 diagnosisData ImbalanceDeep learningTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36061418
PMCPMC9422401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.