Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

SNPMap-An integrated visual SNP interpretation tool.

Miaosen Liu, Jian Yang, Huilong Duan, Lan Yu, Dingwen Wu, Haomin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. NAR molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miaosen LiuSchool of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jian YangThe College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Huilong DuanThe College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lan YuThe Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center, Hangzhou, China.
Dingwen WuThe Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center, Hangzhou, China.
Haomin LiThe Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, have advanced the ability to diagnose diseases and improve prognosis but require the identification of thousands of variants in each report based on several databases scattered across places. Curating an integrated interpretation database is time-consuming, costly, and needs regular update. On the other hand, the automatic curation of knowledge sources always results in overloaded information. In this study, an automated pipeline was proposed to create an integrated visual single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interpretation tool called SNPMap. SNPMap pipelines periodically obtained SNP-related information from LitVar, PubTator, and GWAS Catalog API tools and presented it to the user after extraction, integration, and visualization. Keywords and their semantic relations to each SNP are rendered into two graphs, with their significance represented by the size/width of circles/lines. Moreover, the most related SNPs for each keyword that appeared in SNPMap were calculated and sorted. SNPMap retains the advantage of an automatic process while assisting users in accessing more lucid and detailed information through visualization and integration with other materials.

Indexed as

precision medicinesingle-nucleotide polymorphismvariant interpretationvisualizationweb application

Identifiers

PMID36061173
PMCPMC9437274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.