Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061078›Full record

ArticleStatistical analysis and data mining2022

A General Iterative Clustering Algorithm.

Ziqiang Lin, Eugene Laska, Carole Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical analysis and data mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Behaviour ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A General Iterative Clustering Algorithm.Statistical analysis and data mining · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziqiang LinDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Eugene LaskaDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Carole SiegelDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Topiramate as a treatment for Co-occurring AUD and PTSDP01AA027057 · NIAAA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARMAR, CHARLES R. · 2018 to 2024
$6.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA027057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of a cluster analysis of unlabeled units depends on the quality of the between units dissimilarity measures. Data dependent dissimilarity is more objective than data independent geometric measures such as Euclidean distance. As suggested by Breiman, many data driven approaches are based on decision tree ensembles, such as a random forest (RF), that produce a proximity matrix that can easily be transformed into a dissimilarity matrix. A RF can be obtained using labels that distinguish units with real data from units with synthetic data. The resulting dissimilarity matrix is input to a clustering program and units are assigned labels corresponding to cluster membership. We introduce a General Iterative Cluster (GIC) algorithm that improves the proximity matrix and clusters of the base RF. The cluster labels are used to grow a new RF yielding an updated proximity matrix which is entered into the clustering program. The process is repeated until convergence. The same procedure can be used with many base procedures such as the Extremely Randomized Tree ensemble. We evaluate the performance of the GIC algorithm using benchmark and simulated data sets. The properties measured by the Silhouette Score are substantially superior to the base clustering algorithm. The GIC package has been released in R: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GIC/index.html.

Indexed as

ClusteringExtremely randomized treeExtremely Randomized Treeiterative RF clusteringProximityRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID36061078
PMCPMC9438941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.