Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36061027›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Zoonotic diseases risk perceptions and protective behaviors of consumers associated with consumption of meat and milk in and around Bishoftu, Ethiopia.

Dagne Tsegaye, Fanta D Gutema, Yitagele Terefe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dagne TsegayeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Haramaya, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Fanta D GutemaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 34, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Yitagele TerefeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Haramaya, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of raw or undercooked milk and meat is a major source of zoonoses. Information on the public risk perceptions and protective behaviors are essential for prevention and control of these diseases. However, such information is limited in Ethiopia. We assessed the risk perceptions and protective behaviors of the community toward zoonoses associated with consumption of raw meat and milk by employing the basic constructs of food safety health belief model. We collected data from 210 respondents (105 from each urban and peri-urban) using a face-to-face questionnaire interview. Majority of the respondents (96.2%) had knowledge about zoonoses. Despite their knowledge, 91% and 94.3% had raw meat and raw milk consumption habits, respectively. The odds of raw meat consumption was significantly higher in males (AOR = 3.90; CI = 1.28-11.86) and raw milk consumption was higher in females (AOR = 3.82; CI = 0.78-18.65). About 65% of respondents, obtained meat from backyard slaughtering. Self-owned and smallholder dairy farms are the major sources of milk for peri-urban and urban dwellers, respectively. While 46.7% of the respondents reported that community members are the primary sources of information, only 2.4% reported animal health professionals as their primary source of information. More than half of the respondents either moderately or strongly agreed that consumption of raw meat and raw milk can expose them to zoonoses. Urban dwellers had perceived more seriousness of consuming raw animal products. Peri-urban residents had significantly lower intention than urban ones to implement protective behaviors such as stopping consuming raw meat (P = 0.017) and milk (P = 0.043). We noted that lack of access to refrigerator and pasteurized milk were the perceived barriers for protection against zoonoses among the peri-urban dwellers. There was significant difference in perceived benefits of avoiding consumption of raw meat (P = 0.005) and milk (P = 0.001) between urban and peri-urban residents. Our study showed that irrespective of knowledge about zoonoses, consumptions of raw meat and raw milk remained common practices among the respondents. Public health education on the risk of consumption of raw milk and meat and the significance of protective behaviors using a one-health approach is critically needed to ensure meat and milk safety.

Indexed as

BishoftuFood safety belief modelProtective behaviorsRaw meatRaw milkRisk perceptionsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID36061027
PMCPMC9434031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.