ArticleHeliyon2022
Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for evaluation of C-spine injury from lateral neck radiographs.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for identification of cervical spine fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing deep learning model performance in osteoporosis screening with lumbar spine radiographs.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- External Validation of a Winning Artificial Intelligence Algorithm from the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Challenge.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- An efficient deep learning based approach for automated identification of cervical vertebrae fracture as a clinical support aid.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing Spine Fracture Detection: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Deep learning for osteoporosis screening using an anteroposterior hip radiograph image.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- YOLO-Based Deep Learning Model for Pressure Ulcer Detection and Classification.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with the cervical spine being the most affected. Delayed diagnosis carries a risk of morbidity and mortality. However, cervical spine CT scans are time-consuming, costly, and not always available in general care. In this study, deep learning was used to assess and improve the detection of cervical spine injuries on lateral radiographs, the most widely used screening method to help physicians triage patients quickly and avoid unnecessary CT scans. Materials and methods: Lateral neck or lateral cervical spine radiographs were obtained for patients who underwent CT scan of cervical spine. Ground truth was determined based on CT reports. CiRA CORE, a codeless deep learning program, was used as a training and testing platform. YOLO network models, including V2, V3, and V4, were trained to detect cervical spine injury. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were calculated. Results: A total of 229 radiographs (129 negative and 100 positive) were selected for inclusion in our study from a list of 625 patients with cervical spine CT scans, 181 (28.9%) of whom had cervical spine injury. The YOLO V4 model performed better than the V2 or V3 (AUC = 0.743), with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80%, 72% and 75% respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning can improve the accuracy of lateral c-spine or neck radiographs. We anticipate that this will assist clinicians in quickly triaging patients and help to minimize the number of unnecessary CT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.