ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
The frequency of acid-base disorders on admission to the intensive care and its association with in-hospital outcome, Cape Town, South Africa: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic significance of the mechanism of mild to moderate alkalemia at emergency department admission.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of base excess on mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: insights from US Intensive Care Unit Cohort.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Evolutive acid-base derangements in critically ill patients: epidemiological aspects, association with mortality and metabolic acidosis prediction.Critical care science · 2026Article
- The Effect of Extreme Alkalemia upon Presentation to the Emergency Department on Patient Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Risk prediction models for successful discontinuation in acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: acid-base disorders are very common in critically ill patients and contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify the types of acid-base disorders at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and its associated ICU and in-hospital mortality. Methods: we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients that were admitted to the ICU and had an arterial blood gas sample at the time of admission from 1 Results: a total of 375 patients were included. The median age for the entire cohort was 39 (IQR 30-52) years and 48.3% (n=181) were female. Mixed acid-base disorders were the most common at 48.8% (n=183), followed by no disorder at 24.8% (n=93), metabolic acidosis at 9.3% (n=35), metabolic alkalosis at 6.7% (n=25), respiratory acidosis 6.1% (n=23) and respiratory alkalosis at 4.3% (n=16). A total of 94 (25.0%) patients died. There were no differences in ICU (p = 0.35) or in-hospital death (p = 0.32) by acid-base disorder. Male sex (aOR: 5.8, 95% CI 1.55-21.42; p < 0.01), APACHE II score (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.30; p < 0.01) and the corrected anion gap (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27; p = 0.02) were identified as predictors of in-hospital death using multivariable logistic regression. Conclusion: there was no association between acid-base disorders at the time of ICU admission and ICU or in-hospital death. Therefore, in our setting, acid-base disorders at the time of ICU admission should not be used to predict the outcome of patients requiring intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.