ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Comparison of objective and subjective sleep time and quality in hospitalized recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of sleep quality and engraftment in patients undergoing mobilization and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Observational
- Sleep problems as predictors of cognitive decline in essential tremor: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.Sleep medicine · 2024Article
- Subjective Sleep Disturbance and Lewy Pathology: Data from a Cohort of Essential Tremor Brain Donors.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, the sleep time and efficiency of recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were investigated throughout treatment and compared objective measurements with subjective self-reported data. Methods: Sleep time and efficiency were measured using both objective and subjective methods throughout the treatment period in inpatients receiving HSCT. The participants were recruited among HSCT inpatients at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between August 2019 and August 2020. Actigraphy was used to measure objective sleep time and efficiency. Subjective sleep time and quality were measured using the sleep diary and Insomnia Severity Index. Measurement data from 40 patients were analyzed. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the differences between objective and subjective values in total sleep time and sleep efficiency. Results: The total sleep time was the lowest during the administration of anticancer drugs before stem cell transplantation. The total sleep time of patients with HSCT differed significantly over time when offsetting the difference in the measurement method. There were no significant differences between subjective and objective results for sleep time, and the interaction between the two methods over time was not significant. However, meaningful differences were found among the groups in sleep efficiency throughout the treatment period and between objective and subjective methods, as well as a statistically significant interaction between the two methods over time. Conclusions: Actigraphy misclassified patients' low-energy state with little movement due to immune system impairment during treatment as sleep, resulting in high measured sleep efficiency, whereas their self-reported sleep efficiency was very low. Therefore, subjective measures might be more accurate for measuring sleep efficiency in HSCT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.