Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060827›Full record

SynthesisCanadian respiratory journal2022

The Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Tiotropium in Symptomatic Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Yinhua Gong, Chen Lin, Yifeng Jin, Rong Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yinhua GongDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5642-8714
Chen LinDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6096-247X
Yifeng JinDepartment of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-243X
Rong ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-5086
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Both long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of UMEC/VI versus tiotropium (TIO) 18 Methods: A simple analysis included three studies in the meta-analysis that compared UMEC/VI with TIO. A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of UMEC/VI compared with TIO treatment in symptomatic patients with COPD. First, utilities, clinical efficacy, and adverse events obtained from the literature were utilized as model inputs. Costs were from Chinese average data, including local data. Costs were expressed in dollars based on 2020 prices. Then, the model outputs including drug costs, other medical costs, and total costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Furthermore, incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) were analyzed. Finally, the influences of changing parameters on the uncertainty of the results were assessed by means of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: This study revealed that UMEC/VI treatment had a higher rate of clinical efficacy in comparison with TIO, and the differences in the rate of adverse events between the two treatments were not significant. The results indicated that UMEC/VI was superior to TIO, which provided an increase in QALYs (0.002) and a total cost savings of $765.67 per patient over 3 years. In the base case, the ICER of UMEC/VI is -$397468.04/QALY compared with TIO, suggesting that UMEC/VI may be considered a dominant option over TIO. According to the Chinese medical system, the probability of UMEC/VI being cost-effective was 61.6% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $31554/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust. Conclusion: UMEC/VI could be considered a cost-effective treatment compared with TIO in symptomatic COPD patients from the Chinese National Healthcare System perspective. These results may help decision-makers in China when making judgements on which treatments to administer.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationBenzyl AlcoholsChlorobenzenesCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsHumansQuinuclidinesTiotropium BromideTreatment OutcomeBenzyl AlcoholsBronchodilator AgentsChlorobenzenesDrug CombinationsGSK573719QuinuclidinesTiotropium Bromidevilanterol

Identifiers

PMID36060827
PMCPMC9436597
OpenAlexW4293243343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.