ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Do obese patients benefit from a kinematic, appropriately designed total knee prosthesis?
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanical versus kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty demonstrates acceptable outcomes in obese patients, with insufficient evidence for alternative alignment strategies: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Journey 2 implant utilizes a bicruciate stabilized (BCS) technique. However, whether bicruciate stabilized TKA is equally effective across weight classes is unknown. Methods: We identified patients who underwent primary bicruciate stabilized TKA during 2016 and 2017, at a single institution. All included patients had, at minimum, 2-year follow-up. Patients were categorized into body-mass index (BMI) groups as follows: underweight, normal, or overweight (<30 kg/m Results: The 292 patients had a mean age of 64.8 years and mean BMI of 32.3 kg/m Conclusions: Bicruciate stabilized TKA has similar effects on PROMs across BMI groups. These results suggest that bicruciate stabilized TKA is a viable treatment option both for low-weight and high-weight patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.