Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060729›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics

Treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures: A systematic review.

Caleb P Shin, Luke D Mascarenhas, Brendan M Holderread, Matthew Awad, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, Ishaq Syed, James M Rizkalla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caleb P ShinBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
Luke D MascarenhasBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
Brendan M HolderreadHouston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Matthew AwadCoptic Medical Association of North America (CMANA) Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
David BotrosCoptic Medical Association of North America (CMANA) Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
Ioannis AvramisBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
Ishaq SyedBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.
James M RizkallaBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75246, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intro: Sacral insufficiency fractures after lumbosacral fusion continue to establish themselves as a rare complication after surgery. The diagnosis can often be missed due to inconclusive imaging and non-specific symptoms. In the literature, the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures varies from non-operative and conservative management to surgical intervention with lumbopelvic fixation. Methods: We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed database using sacral insufficiency fracture treatment after lumbosacral fusion and sacral insufficiency fracture after posterior spinal instrumentation as keywords. Results: This search strategy identified 32 publications from the PubMed database for literature review. After evaluating the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 17 articles were included in the review. 65% of sacral insufficiency fractures were managed surgically with 35% of patients proceeding with non-operative, conservative management only. Revision surgery always involved sacropelvic fixation which typically led to immediate resolution or reduction of symptoms, with the exception of 2 cases that did not receive adequate reduction of symptoms. Five cases reported failed non-operative management that subsequently responded to revision surgery. Conclusion: Outcomes after non-operative management usually leads to symptom resolution; however has a slower symptom relief time as well as a higher chance of failed treatment. Operative outcomes, generally with a variation of sacropelvic fixation lead to immediate symptom resolution and very rarely failed treatment. Clinicians must always maintain a high index of suspicion of new onset lower back or sacral pain after lumbosacral surgery and order a CT scan to rule out a potential insufficiency fracture. Objectives: The objective of this study was to review the literature to examine treatment options for sacral insufficiency fractures after lumbosacral fusion in order to improve clinical practice and management. This systematic review of the literature regarding treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures will assist clinicians in making the accurate diagnosis and devise a strategic treatment plan for patients with sacral insufficiency fractures after spinal instrumentation.

Indexed as

InsufficiencyLumbosacral fusionOrthopedicsSacral fractureTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36060729
PMCPMC9433979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.