SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Efficacy of Cetuximab in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Receiving Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualised cumulative cisplatin dose for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response and tumour volume.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Retracted: Efficacy of Cetuximab in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Receiving Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant neoplasm of the nasopharyngeal epithelium. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been established as a standard treatment for locoregional NPC, and cisplatin is a common agent in NPC treatment. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the curative effectiveness and survival outcomes of cetuximab in NPC patients who received concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) were used to search publications studying on concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or cetuximab in NPC. The qualities of included RCTs were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. STATA 14.0 was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Results: In total, 17 trials with 2066 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results from this study show that cetuximab improved the therapy efficacy in NPC patients who received concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy. Cetuximab cotreatment improved the complete response (RR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.61, 2.30]), and reduced stable disease (RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.51, 0.88]) as well as progression disease (RR = 0.24, 95% CI [0.15, 0.40]). Besides, it also improved the overall survival (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.02, 1.18]), disease-free survival (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.03, 1.15]), metastasis-free survival (RR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.01, 1.11]), and relapse-free survival (RR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.01, 1.07]) in NPC patients. Conclusions: Cetuximab could improve the curative efficacy and survival outcomes of NPC patients who underwent concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy. However, all the trials included were conducted in China; thus, the quality of the trials in this study remains doubtful. More high-quality RCTs should be included in further relevant studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.