Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060637›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Rodent Model of Brain Radionecrosis Using Clinical LINAC-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Sean P Devan, Guozhen Luo, Xiaoyu Jiang, Jingping Xie, Daniel Dean, Levi S Johnson, Manuel Morales-Paliza, Hannah Harmsen, Junzhong Xu, Austin N Kirschner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ex vivo brain MRI to assess conventional and FLASH brain irradiation effects.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Joint estimation of compartment-specific TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sean P DevanChemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Guozhen LuoDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Xiaoyu JiangVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science.
Jingping XieVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science.
Daniel DeanDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Levi S JohnsonDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Manuel Morales-PalizaDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Hannah HarmsenPathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Junzhong XuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science.
Austin N KirschnerDepartments of Radiation Oncology.

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to develop a rodent model of brain radionecrosis using clinical linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods and Materials: Single fraction maximum prescription points in the mouse's left hemisphere were irradiated using linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery with multiple arcs at 60 (n = 5), 100 (n = 5), and 140 (n = 5) Gy. Rats (n = 6) were similarly treated with 140 Gy. Gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to track radiation injury in mice over weeks (100 and 140 Gy) or months (60 Gy). Target accuracy was measured by the distance from the prescription point to the center of the earliest Gd-MRI enhancement. Confirmation of necrosis via histology was performed at the subject endpoints. Results: Radiation injury as indicated by Gd-MRI was first identified at 2 weeks (140 Gy), 4 to 6 weeks (100 Gy), and 8 months (60 Gy). A volumetric time course showed rapid growth in the volume of Gd-MRI signal enhancement after the appearance of apparent necrosis. Histopathologic features were consistent with radionecrosis. Conclusions: The presented method uses a commonly available clinical linear accelerator to induce radiation necrosis in both mice and rats. The treatment is modeled after patient therapy for a more direct model of human tissue under a range of doses used in clinical neuro-ablation techniques. The short time to onset of apparent necrosis, accurate targeting of the prescription point, high incidence of necrosis, and similar pathologic features make this a suitable animal model for further research in radionecrosis.

Identifiers

PMID36060637
PMCPMC9436710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.