Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060605›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Dilated transformer: residual axial attention for breast ultrasound image segmentation.

Xiaoyan Shen, Liangyu Wang, Yu Zhao, Ruibo Liu, Wei Qian, He Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoyan ShenThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Liangyu WangThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Yu ZhaoThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Ruibo LiuThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Wei QianThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
He MaThe College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The segmentation of breast ultrasound (US) images has been a challenging task, mainly due to limited data and the inherent image characteristics involved, such as low contrast and speckle noise. Although convolutional neural network-based (CNN-based) methods have made significant progress over the past decade, they lack the ability to model long-range interactions. Recently, the transformer method has been successfully applied to the tasks of computer vision. It has a strong ability to capture distant interactions. However, most transformer-based methods with excellent performance rely on pre-training on large datasets, making it infeasible to directly apply them to medical images analysis, especially that of breast US images with limited high-quality labels. Therefore, it is of great significance to find a robust and efficient transformer-based method for use on small breast US image datasets. Methods: We developed a dilated transformer (DT) method which mainly uses the proposed residual axial attention layers to build encoder blocks and the introduced dilation module (DM) to further increase the receptive field. We evaluated the proposed method on 2 breast US image datasets using the 5-fold cross-validation method. Dataset A was a public dataset with 562 images, while dataset B was a private dataset with 878 images. Ground truth (GT) was delineated by 2 radiologists with more than 5 years of experience. The evaluation was followed by related ablation experiments. Results: The DT was found to be comparable with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) CNN-based method and outperformed the related transformer-based method, medical transformer (MT), on both datasets. Especially on dataset B, the DT outperformed the MT on metrics of Jaccard index (JI) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) by 2.67% and 4.68%, respectively. Meanwhile, when compared with Unet, the DT improved JI and DSC by 4.89% and 4.66%, respectively. Moreover, the results of the ablation experiments showed that each add-on part of the DT is important and contributes to the segmentation accuracy. Conclusions: The proposed transformer-based method could achieve advanced segmentation performance on different small breast US image datasets without pretraining.

Indexed as

axial attentionBreast ultrasound (US)residualtransformertumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36060605
PMCPMC9403584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.