ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Computed tomography characteristics of acute pancreatitis based on different etiologies at different onset times: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of modified CT severity index by incorporating lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for early stratification in acute pancreatitis: a single-center validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical and CT/MRI imaging features of acute pancreatitis in older people.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Computed tomography features of recurrent acute pancreatitis based on different etiologies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of Biliary Acute Pancreatitis-A Seven-Year Experience of a Large Tertiary Center.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence models assisting physicians in quantifying pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical features of different parts of the pancreas involved in acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- CT characteristics of recurrent acute pancreatitis and acute pancreatitis in different stages-a retrospective cross-sectional study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical characteristics and imaging findings of acute pancreatitis (AP) are different across the various etiologies, the results are conflicting, and their time from symptom onset to imaging varies. The imaging findings of different etiologies at different onset times are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the computed tomography (CT) characteristics of AP based on different etiologies at different onset times. Methods: Patients who underwent plain and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the first attack of AP in 3 hospitals (Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Chinese People's Liberation Army Western Theater General Hospital, and Suining Central Hospital) from 2015 to 2019 were recruited. According to the different etiologies of AP, the patients were divided into 5 subgroups: biliary AP (n=591), alcoholic AP (n=267), hypertriglyceridemic AP (n=258), mixed causes subgroups (n=199), and "other/idiopathic" AP (n=545). According to the time from onset to CT examination (e.g., 1-3, 4-7, 8-14, 15-28, and >28 days), the onset time was divided into 5 respective phases (I-V). The CT characteristics and clinical and laboratory features were retrospectively reviewed and compared among the different etiology subgroups and onset time. Results: The positive rate of CT findings in AP diagnosis based on CECT was 96.7% (1,860/1,924). Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) occurred in 33.2% (617/1,860) of AP patients with positive CECT findings. Among patients with NP, local complications and severe AP of the modified CT severity index (MCTSI) increased over time in those with biliary AP from 17.1%, 25.2%, and 20.0% in Phase I to 42.9%, 44.0%, and 39.7% in Phase IV [all P<0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15 to 0.52, 0.28 to 0.63, and 0.18 to 0.82, respectively]. In contrast, NP, local complications and severe AP of MCTSI in those with hypertriglyceridemic AP decreased over time from 24.3%, 22.5%, and 22.7% in Phase I to 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.9% in Phase V (all P<0.05, 95% CI: 3.20 to 181.74, 3.31 to 175.74, and 2.00 to 120.78, respectively). Conclusions: The proportion of NP was 33.2% of positive CECT findings. There may be differences in the CT and clinical manifestations of the different etiologies, and those differences may be related to the onset time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.