ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic assessment of ductal carcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Factors Associated With Preoperative Radiological Tumor Size Underestimation in Clinical T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Scalable and objective wound infection screening from clinical images using deep learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- CNN-Based Cross-Modality Fusion for Enhanced Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammography and Ultrasound.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with clinicopathological features in microinvasive ductal carcinomaGland surgery · 2024Article
- Ultrasound deep learning radiomics and clinical machine learning models to predict low nuclear grade, ER, PR, and HER2 receptor status in pure ductal carcinomaGland surgery · 2024Article
- Application of ultrasound-based radiomics models of breast masses to predict invasive components of encapsulated papillary carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep learning radiomics for prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage T1-2 breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Deep learning for the prediction of residual tumor after radiotherapy and treatment decision-making in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence diagnosis of intrauterine adhesion by 3D ultrasound imaging: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Deep learning model for the diagnosis of breast cancers smaller than 1 cm with ultrasonography: integration of ultrasonography and clinical factors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment and prognosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with and without microinvasion (MIC) are different. Ultrasound imaging shows that DCIS is a heterogeneous breast tumor with diverse manifestations. DCIS means that the cancer cells are confined in the duct without penetrating the basement membrane, MIC means that the cancer cells penetrate the basement membrane and the maximum diameter of any largest invasive lesion is less than or equal to 1 mm. This study was designed to evaluate how deep learning can be used to identify DCIS with MIC on ultrasound images. Methods: The clinical and ultrasound data of 467 consecutive inpatients diagnosed with DCIS (213 with MIC) in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected from January 2013 to April 2019 and randomly apportioned to training and internal validation sets. An external validation set comprised data from Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital with 101 patients (33 with MIC) collected between January 2017 and December 2019. There were 2,492 original images; 66% of these were used to establish a model, and the remaining 34% were used to evaluate the model. Three experienced breast ultrasound clinicians analyzed the ultrasound images to establish a logistic regression model. Finally, the logistic regression model and five deep learning models (ResNet-50, ResNet-101, DenseNet-161, DenseNet-169, and Inception-v3) were compared and evaluated to assess their diagnostic efficiency when identifying MIC based on ultrasound image data. Results: The characteristics of high nuclear grade (P<0.001), necrosis (P=0.006), estrogen receptor negative (ER Conclusions: Deep learning can be used to identify MIC of breast DCIS from ultrasound images. Models based on Inception-v3 can provide automated detection of DCIS with MIC from ultrasound images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.