Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060588›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma

Meng Zhu, Yong Pi, Zekun Jiang, Yanyan Wu, Hong Bu, Ji Bao, Yujuan Chen, Lijun Zhao, Yulan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meng ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong PiMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zekun JiangWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yanyan WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Hong BuLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ji BaoLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yujuan ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lijun ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yulan PengDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The treatment and prognosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with and without microinvasion (MIC) are different. Ultrasound imaging shows that DCIS is a heterogeneous breast tumor with diverse manifestations. DCIS means that the cancer cells are confined in the duct without penetrating the basement membrane, MIC means that the cancer cells penetrate the basement membrane and the maximum diameter of any largest invasive lesion is less than or equal to 1 mm. This study was designed to evaluate how deep learning can be used to identify DCIS with MIC on ultrasound images. Methods: The clinical and ultrasound data of 467 consecutive inpatients diagnosed with DCIS (213 with MIC) in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected from January 2013 to April 2019 and randomly apportioned to training and internal validation sets. An external validation set comprised data from Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital with 101 patients (33 with MIC) collected between January 2017 and December 2019. There were 2,492 original images; 66% of these were used to establish a model, and the remaining 34% were used to evaluate the model. Three experienced breast ultrasound clinicians analyzed the ultrasound images to establish a logistic regression model. Finally, the logistic regression model and five deep learning models (ResNet-50, ResNet-101, DenseNet-161, DenseNet-169, and Inception-v3) were compared and evaluated to assess their diagnostic efficiency when identifying MIC based on ultrasound image data. Results: The characteristics of high nuclear grade (P<0.001), necrosis (P=0.006), estrogen receptor negative (ER Conclusions: Deep learning can be used to identify MIC of breast DCIS from ultrasound images. Models based on Inception-v3 can provide automated detection of DCIS with MIC from ultrasound images.

Indexed as

Breastdeep learningductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)microinvasionultrasound image

Identifiers

PMID36060588
PMCPMC9403599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.