Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060579›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Micro-CT in ophthalmology:

Jens Runge, Thomas Stahnke, Rudolf F Guthoff, Andreas Wree, Jonas Keiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jens RungeInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas StahnkeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Rudolf F GuthoffDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Andreas WreeInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Jonas KeilerInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides detailed 3-dimensional (3D) visualization of anatomical structures and encourages morphological reinvestigation of organs with delicate features. The low radiodensity of soft tissues necessitates preceding sample preparation to conduct X-ray imaging with decent contrast between different tissues. In this study, we demonstrate the preparation with three radiopaque agents in combination with elimination of liquids by critical point drying (CPD) introduced for ocular samples. Methods: Enucleated porcine eyes were prepared with ethanolic iodine (EI), aqueous iodine-potassium iodide, or ethanolic phosphotungstic acid (EPTA). Micro-CT scans of the samples were conducted in a moist environment with an isotropic resolution of 9.2-12.5 µm voxel size. Subsequently, samples were chemically dehydrated and critical point (CP) dried to conduct a second scan in a dry environment with a resolution up to 4.7-5.4 µm in voxel size. The visualization effects were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively evaluated with regard to the generated contrast between different ocular tissues. Results: All three contrast agents accumulated well in most of the investigated ocular tissues and lead to an increased X-ray attenuation which allowed for differentiated visualization of ocular structures. Problematic agent penetration into the lens was obvious for iodine-potassium iodide and EPTA. Artificial damages of the lens and thickness reduction for the cornea and sclera due to CPD were noticed. The effects of the different contrasting treatments are described and compared with regard to the effects of CPD. Exclusively CP dried samples that were not treated with contrast agents could also be visualized excellently with a good distinction of different ocular structures from each other. Conclusions: All ocular structures can be visualized by micro-CT. To contrast moist samples, the best results were achieved with iodine potassium iodide (IPI). CPD improved the scan quality in all cases. Even without pretreatment with contrasting agents, the CP dried samples showed a contrast similar to the IPI treated samples.

Indexed as

chemical dehydrationcontrast agentsOcular structuressoft tissueX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36060579
PMCPMC9403582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.