ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Clinical evaluation of a novel atlas-based PET/CT brain image segmentation and quantification method for epilepsy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuum topological derivative - A novel application tool for segmentation of CT and MRI images.Neuroimage. Reports · 2024Article
- Impact of deep learning-based multiorgan segmentation methods on patient-specific internal dosimetry in PET/CT imaging: A comparative study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with [ Methods: For image segmentation, a head anatomy template was registered to the subject image by integrating dual-modality image registration and landmark-constraint. The localizations of abnormalities were examined by quantitative comparison using the collected database. The PET/CT images of 20 reference patients and 11 patients with epilepsy were used to compare results between the proposed manual method and statistical parameter mapping (SPM). A dice coefficient analysis was performed on the six central brain regions to assess the segmentation effectiveness, and the diagnostic results of the epileptic regions were examined using pathological results as a reference. Results: The dice results of the proposed method were generally higher than those of SPM, with the averaged dice values for the proposed method and SPM being 0.78 and 0.55, respectively, in the reference group (P<0.001), and 0.73 and 0.48, respectively, in the epileptic group (P<0.001). Our proposed method detected all the pathologically reported epileptic defects; however, using the visual assessment method, epileptic defects were missed in three patients. Both the proposed and visual assessment methods incorrectly identified non-epileptic areas as epileptic areas. Conclusions: The results provide strong evidence of the feasibility of using our proposed method for accurate brain region segmentation in the diagnosis of epilepsy. Our atlas-based approach has promise for clinical application in the image processing and diagnosis of patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.