Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060517›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results of an open-label, noninferiority, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.

Yan Wang, Chengtao Wang, Shasha He, Li Bai, Fei Kong, Siyang Wang, Lei Cui, Qiang Qin, Yunying Yang, Wei Xiao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of 108 cases of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma from a single center].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chengtao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shasha HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Fei KongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hainan Provincial People's Hospital: Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Siyang WangDepartment of Head and neck Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Lei CuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Medical College of Shantou University, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Qiang QinDepartment of Oncology, Foshan Shunde District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital: Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ShunDe Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Yunying YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wei XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Meiyan ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zeyu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yulin LaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wenjing BaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhenwei PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yong ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Induction chemotherapy regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) are currently clinically used for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) but have well-known side effects, such as myelosuppression and diarrhea. A docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) regimen was developed to decrease the toxic effects induced by fluorouracil. In this trial, we assessed whether the TP induction chemotherapy regimen was noninferior to the TPF regimen. Methods: We performed an open-label, noninferiority, phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial at six centres in China. Eligible patients with NPC (stage III-IVA (excluding T3-4N0), Karnofsky's Performance Scoring ≥70) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TP (docetaxel (75 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) and cisplatin (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area, d1, intravenous infusion)) or TPF (docetaxel (60 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) plus cisplatin (60 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg per square meter, d1-d5, intravenous 120-hour infusion)) administered every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, safety, and treatment compliance. The trial was stopped early because of strong evidence for noninferiority (margin was -10%) of TP in failure-free survival. Efficacy analyses were performed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol trial populations and we included the patients who started treatment in each group for the safety analysis. The study was registered with chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800016337. Findings: Between June 1, 2018 and October 31, 2021, we randomly assigned 361 patients to the TP ( Interpretation: The preliminary results revealed that TP induction chemotherapy regimen was found to be clearly non-inferior compared to the TPF regimen in failure-free survival, with a lower frequency of neutropenia, anaemia and diarrhoea. The more convenient and beneficial survival regimen of the TP regimen should be recommended in patients with LA-NPC. Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [grant number 2021A1515011182], Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [grant number 2022A1515012272], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82072029] and National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81903037].

Indexed as

Docetaxel, cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF)Docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP)Nasopharyngeal carcinomaSurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID36060517
PMCPMC9433608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.