Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060421›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2022

Review on Nanomaterials and Nano-Scaled Systems for Topical and Systemic Delivery of Antifungal Drugs.

Gamachu Diba Nagasa, Anteneh Belete

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gamachu Diba Nagasa *Department of Pharmacy, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Anteneh Belete *Department of Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal infections are human infections that topically affect the skin, mucous membranes, or more serious, invasive, and systemic diseases of the internal organs. The design and advancement of the formulation and approach of administration for therapeutic agents depend on many variables. The correlation between the formulations, mode of administration, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and clinical indication must be thoroughly studied for the successful evolution of suitable drug delivery systems. There are several NP formulations that serve as good delivery approaches for antifungal drugs. This paper covers various groups of nanoparticles utilized in antifungal drug delivery, such as phospholipid-based vesicles (nanovesicles), non-phospholipid vesicles, polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles and dendrimers, whereby their advantages and drawbacks are emphasized. Many in vitro or cell culture studies with NP formulations achieve an adequate high drug-loading capacity; they do not reach the clinically significant concentrations anticipated for in vivo studies. Because of this, the transfer of these nano-formulations from the laboratory to the clinic could be aided by focusing studies on overcoming problems related to nanoparticle stability, drug loading, and high production and standardization costs.

Indexed as

anti-fungal drugsinorganic nanoparticlesnano-scalednano-vesiclespolymeric nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID36060421
PMCPMC9432385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.