Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060406›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Rawah Shafiq Aljishi, Ali Hussin Alkuaibi, Fadel Abbas Al Zayer, Ali Hassan Al Matouq

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rawah Shafiq AljishiCritical Care Medicine, King Salman Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Ali Hussin AlkuaibiCritical Care Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Fadel Abbas Al ZayerCritical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialized Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, SAU.
Ali Hassan Al MatouqCritical Care Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 may result in acute respiratory distress (ARDS) in patients with the severe form of the disease. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can support respiratory gas interchange in patients failing conventional methods, but its effectiveness in COVID patients is still debatable. The aim of this study is to find the survival outcomes of patients with and without COVID-19 ARDS who were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases were searched from 2020 to 2022. Studies comparing the outcomes of ECMO in COVID and non-COVID ARDS were included. The outcomes that were measured were mortality or survival, survival to discharge, ECMO duration, and complications. This systematic review encompassed 12 retrospective observational studies and one quasi-controlled trial, including a total of 12 studies that recruited 1,133 patients (495 COVID-19 and 638 non-COVID ARDS patients) and were published between 2020 and 2022. The overall mortality rate of ECMO-supported COVID-19 patients was 41% and ranged between 14.7% and 67%. On the other hand, non-COVID ARDS patients' mortality rate ranges from 14.3% to 50%. In comparison, COVID-19 patients had a prolonged duration of ECMO therapy as well as increased bleeding and thrombotic complications. Our findings suggest that ECMO remains a viable option for the management of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome for selected patients. The observed mortality rate was 41%. Meta-analyses are warranted to obtain more conclusive results and assess the risk.

Indexed as

ardscomplicationscovid-19ecmoextracorporeal membrane oxygenationmortality

Identifiers

PMID36060406
PMCPMC9427068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.