ArticleCureus2022
Pregnancy and Childbirth in Women With Meningioma.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Ten percent of women of childbearing age have histologically confirmed meningioma. To date, little is known regarding pregnancy-related outcomes for women with meningioma. Methods We used a de-identified database network (TriNetX's Research Network, https://trinetx.com/) to gather information on pregnant patients with meningioma (cohort 1) versus pregnant patients without meningioma (cohort 2). The primary outcome of interest included the impact of meningioma on mortality at one year. Secondary endpoints included ectopic or molar pregnancy, cesarean section, abortion, preterm labor, depression, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and craniotomy. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure levels of association between each cohort and the outcomes of interest. Results A total of 1,739 patients were identified in each cohort following propensity-score matching. Mortality was seen in 23 patients (1.32%) in cohort 1 versus 26 patients (1.41%) in cohort 2 (OR 0.88, 95% CI {0.50, 1.55}, p=0.66). Ectopic/ molar pregnancy was seen in 31 (1.78%) versus 42 (2.42%) patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (OR 0.73, 95% CI {0.046,1.17}, p=0.19). Cesarean section was seen in 126 (7.25%) versus 164 (9.43%) patients, respectively (OR 0.75, 95% CI {0.59,0.97}, p=0.020). Abortion was seen in 128 (7.36%) versus 183 (10.52%) patients, respectively (OR 0.68, 95% CI {0.53,0.86}, p=0.0011). Preterm labor was seen in 75 (4.31%) versus 119 (6.84%) patients, respectively (OR 0.61, 95% CI {0.46,0.83}, p=0.0012). Depression was seen in 258 (14.84%) versus 270 (15.53%) patients, respectively (OR 0.95, 95% CI {0.79,1.14}, p=0.57). Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was seen in 3.11% versus 5.52% patients, respectively (OR 0.55, 95% CI {0.39,0.77}, p=0.0005). Craniotomy was seen in 74 (4.26%) versus 0 (0%) patients in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. Conclusion Patients with meningioma were not at higher risk for pregnancy complications, including ectopic/molar pregnancy, cesarean section, abortion, preterm labor, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and mortality, compared to their non-meningioma counterparts. Still, coordinated care by neurosurgical and obstetrical providers may benefit women with meningiomas who are planning for pregnancy or are currently pregnant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.