Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060359›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Hypospadias: A Comprehensive Review Including Its Embryology, Etiology and Surgical Techniques.

Sattam A Halaseh, Shahed Halaseh, Mohannad Ashour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07575204 (Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Paediatric Hypospadias Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07575204 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Paediatric Hypospadias Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsHypospadias, Pudendal Nerve Block, Penile Nerve Block, Postoperative PainArmsUltrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block, Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sattam A HalasehGeneral and Colorectal Surgery, Torbay Hospital, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.
Shahed HalasehSurgery, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JOR.
Mohannad AshourUrology, The Specialty Hospital, Amman, JOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypospadias is among the most prevalent urogenital malformations in male newborns. It is characterized by the displacement of the urethral meatus to the ventral side of the penis, an aberrant ventral curve of the penis referred to as "chordee," and an abnormally arranged foreskin with a "hood" found dorsally and lacking foreskin ventrally. Patients may have an extra genitourinary abnormality based on the area of the lesion. In around 70% of cases, the urethral meatus is positioned distally to the shaft, representing a milder form of the disease. The remaining 30% of cases are located proximally, are more complicated, and require further evaluation. Although the origin of hypospadias is mostly obscure, several suggestions exist about genetic susceptibility and hormonal factors. The objective of hypospadias restoration is to restore aesthetic and functional regularity, and surgery is currently advised at a young age, mostly between six and 18 months. At any age, hypospadias can be repaired with an equivalent risk of complications, functional outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes. However, the best age of treatment is still undetermined. Even though the long-term effects on appearance and sexual function are usually good, males may be less likely to make the first move after rectification. Also, people who have hypospadias treated are twice as likely to have problems with their lower urinary tract. These problems can last for years after the initial repair.

Indexed as

external genital developmenthypospadiashypospadias repairoutcomepediatric suregerypenis

Identifiers

PMID36060359
PMCPMC9428502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.