Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36060344›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Submental Intubation in Maxillofacial Procedures: A More Desired Approach Than Nasotracheal Intubation and Tracheostomy.

Kerry-Ann D Williams, Maha Tariq, Maitri V Acharekar, Sara Elena Guerrero Saldivia, Sumedha Unnikrishnan, Yeny Y Chavarria, Adebisi O Akindele, Ana P Jalkh, Aziza K Eastmond, Chaitra Shetty and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kerry-Ann D WilliamsResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Maha TariqResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Maitri V AcharekarResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sara Elena Guerrero SaldiviaResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sumedha UnnikrishnanResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Yeny Y ChavarriaResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Adebisi O AkindeleResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ana P JalkhResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aziza K EastmondResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Chaitra ShettyResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Syed Muhammad Hannan Ali RizviResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Joudi SharafResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Lubna MohammedInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve adequate airway management in maxillofacial procedures, the right intubation technique should be employed. This is because the surgeons and the anesthesiologists will need to work in the same surgical field to ensure a successful procedure. The type of intubation method used can either complicate either's role or pose some difficulties in the surgery itself. Nasotracheal intubation and orotracheal intubation may often be contraindicated in different types of maxillofacial surgeries and due to the complications associated with a tracheostomy, this method is often utilized as a last resort. Submental intubation has become very popular and favored alternative and has been associated with fewer complications. This literature review was conducted to explore the indications, complications, and contraindications of the different intubation methods. Sources were gathered from PubMed Central, PubMed, and Google scholar and included articles published between 2012 and 2022. A mix of literature reviews, case base studies, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and a few systematic reviews were examined. It was found that the use of submental intubation was preferred due to its less invasive nature, minimal intraoperatively and postoperatively complications, and greater patient compliance compared to tracheostomy. In addition, it is the best method when Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated.

Indexed as

airway managementanesthesiaemergency airwayendotracheal intubationintubatenasal cavitynasotracheal intubationskull fracture proceduresthroattracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID36060344
PMCPMC9421558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.